• Skip to main content

Executive Coaching and Leadership Development

Executive Coaching, Leadership Development, Successor Development, and Successor Recruiting, Portland, OR

  • Home
  • Services
    • Senior Executive Coaching
    • Leadership Development
    • “Problem Leader” Coaching
    • Business Successor Development Program
    • 360° Leadership Assessment
    • Quality of Leadership Report
    • Get Hired Sooner >
  • Leadership Book
  • Speaking
  • Blog
  • About
    • About Michael Beck
    • Testimonials
  • Contact

Employee Engagement

When Successors Manage Instead of Lead

Managing People

Most owners feel they’ve done a good job preparing their successor, yet many successors fail once they take over. One of the major causes is that they continue to manage the company rather than lead it. And when people get “managed” engagement drops and results suffer.

Two of the most common ways an executive “manages” people are by “treating people like things” and by “treating adults like children”.

How does someone “treat people like things”? They do it in several ways. They do it when they’re insensitive to them and interact with people as if they have no feelings. They treat people like things when they ignore the fact that everyone has hopes and dreams and fears and stress. They treat people like things when they relate to people as if their own goals and aspirations are more important than another person’s goals and aspirations. And they treat people like things when they don’t show respect for people nor value their contributions, efforts, and potential.

When someone treats a person like a thing, it sends the message that they are unimportant and that they just don’t care about them. And when people sense a leader doesn’t care about them, they start not to care about that leader. When the company tolerates leaders who don’t care about people, people tend not to care about the company. And when people don’t care, there is no engagement.

In contrast, an effective leader understands that people’s hopes, dreams, fears, and stresses are real and matter to them. A leader inspires people. A leader interacts with people as people, helping them to be their best. A leader treats people the way they themselves want to be treated. And a leader helps people achieve their own goals.

How does someone “treat adults like children”? Think for a moment about how parents relate to children and why they relate that way. They generally tell children what they need to do and when they need to do it. They do that because they don’t trust a child’s judgment, their sense of responsibility, and/or their self-discipline. They regularly check up on children because they don’t trust them to follow through on their commitments. They check up on children because they don’t trust them to be responsible.

When a leader doesn’t trust people to do what needs to be done and doesn’t trust their judgment, he or she is treating them as if they are children. When they micromanage people, they are treating them like children. And when they treat people like children, it shows a lack of respect and trust. When people feel they aren’t respected and trusted by a leader, they lose respect for that leader. When people feel they aren’t respected and valued, there is no engagement.

If someone doesn’t know what to do, then our job as a leader is to develop their knowledge and abilities. The shortcoming lies with the leader, not the follower. If someone lacks the necessary judgment for a task or decision, then our job as a leader is to develop their judgment. If their judgment remains inadequate, then either we aren’t as competent a leader as we need to be, or we just have the wrong person on our team. Either way, resorting to treating someone as a child is a poor course of action.

Regardless of how well a successor knows the mechanics of a business, if they don’t hone their leadership skills, the best they can hope for are mediocre results.

If you’d like help evaluating your successor’s leadership abilities and/or help with developing their weaker areas, please contact me.

December 14, 2018 Filed Under: Employee Engagement, Leadership, Succession


Misuse of “The Hammer” by Leaders

I’ve never met an executive who thought they were a poor leader. Most will say there is always room for improvement, but that they generally do a good job. And yet… we all know people who are poor leaders!

These leaders often feel that they know what should be done and how it should be done. So they adopt a “command and control” style of leadership, “guiding” the people around them. If they aren’t successful at getting their way they “pound” on them – basically ordering them to do what they say. I call it “using the hammer”.

This approach is appropriate for urgent situations or emergencies, but is rarely effective in most other circumstances. At best, when a leader takes this approach, they simply get compliance from their people. At worst, they elicit passive-aggressive behavior. And to compound matters, the results gained form compliance are weak compared to those gained by a committed workforce.

In essence, they’re treating adults like children. This style of leadership demonstrates that they don’t trust or respect those around them. It shows that they don’t value them as professionals and it generally causes disengagement. Micromanaging is a common variation of this style of leadership.

If a leader really wants to bring out the best in people, he or she needs to treats adults like adults and professionals like professionals. Effective leaders learn how to influence and persuade people to buy into their ideas and suggestions. Effective leaders give people autonomy, allowing them to do their work in their own way.

That’s not to say that these leaders accept mediocrity. Far from it. In fact, this approach – when done correctly – allows a leader to hold people more accountable and it allows them to hold people to a higher standard of performance.

Besides, taking this approach doesn’t take away any power from the leader. A leader always reserves the right to use “the hammer” and tell someone exactly what he or she wants done. It should only be used when a leader’s powers of influence fall short and/or when someone’s judgment is flawed. A leader always has the prerogative of dictating what should be done and how it should be done. But using the hammer is a last resort when nothing else works.

Everyone feels they have something to contribute and want to be heard. The key to bringing out the best in people is to value and respect them. Eliciting excellence is the essence of exceptional leadership.

If you’d like help in refining your leadership effectiveness, please call. We offer assessments and executive coaching – all designed to boost your leadership effectiveness.

May 11, 2017 Filed Under: Employee Engagement, Leadership


  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4

      Privacy      Terms      Legal      Copyright © 2026 · Michael Beck International, Inc.